James and Lily Potter

  Why were they middle aged in the movies? The books made it clear that James and Lily married almost right out of school and had Harry when they were all of twenty or twenty-one! I get so mad when I see the celluloid version of these characters. What were the directors thinking? They made Lily a pale, fading sort of house-wifey woman and James a professorial sort of man with flat, thin hair and a generic kindly, fatherly face!
What the hell? Lily was a really strong willed girl as was James- a hell-raiser and a rebel! They were at the forefront of the resistance when Voldemort was in power and the best aurors along with the Longbottoms that the Order of Phoenix had as members!
Why were they made so vapid and retiring? Ugh! Did the directors think that portraying a couple in twenties who died in the first year of their child's life would pain emotional parents across the globe, or did they assume that sticking to the books' version of things would be promoting early marriage between young couples?
Whatever their reason, I can't help but feeling the tiniest bit betrayed that Rowling allowed it.
I know the protest comes too late from me, and that others may have already mentioned it, but still! I've read that Rowling approved the script and she had creative inputs in the movies- she even had a hand in casting, so why, oh why, didn't she object?
She was offered Lily's cameo in the first movie- the appearacnce in the Mirror of Erised, but she backed off. Couldn't she have made it clear then, that the ages of those two characters were important?
I suppose I feel strongly about James and Lily because what little Rowling has written of their love story was touching, sweet and totally entrancing. I want more. Even if she never wrote another book about Harry Potter, I do hope she some day writes a little more on Lily Evans and James Potter and if possible, a little more on Sirius Black.
Its heart-wrenching that they died so young, but it would be a terrible thing if their story was never told in a telling that was only for them.

  

See what I mean?

                                                        This is how they OUGHT to be!!

This was Ok. Sort of. Bleh.

The King's Speech

You can hate the movie but you can't- I guarantee- hate Colin Firth as King George VI! I don't say that you will like the man- I frowned quite consistently through certain parts of the movie at him- silently reproving the man- but as an actor- Oh, man!- he was the shiniest penny in the room and he would NOT be ignored.

The movie began with a speech in Wembley stadium at the close of the British Empire Exhibition in 1925.

Guess who was supposed to give it?

Oh, you're brilliant! Yes, it was Prince Bertie. In his middle age and very used to his inability to speak in public or even to his family without long pauses and tripping over words.

But his father wouldn't give up trying to cure him of it through forced exposure. King George V believed in tough love and the dutiful Bertie obliged to embarrassing effects. 

He stood in front of a thousand men and women of his kingdom and couldn't utter the word 'king'.

His brother Edward fell in love with a Mrs Simpson. It was nothing unusual, the heir-apparent liked married women.

I just noticed that with the glaring exception of According to Greta all of my  movie reviews have been of English movies (Brit English, in case you missed the upper case on 'e'). Which is great, because there are way too many blogs out there devoted to Hollywood. Anyway, my next review will be on King's Speech, which I recently watched and loved.
Well...my expectations might have been a little high and the story was slightly different than I had expected but even so, I will watch it again. If that doesn't tell you that it was good, well...I guess someone else will.